Studying Time: 4 minutes
Megyn Kelly picked a bizarre time to separate hairs about Jeffrey Epstein and pedophilia.
This week, the world first noticed Epstein’s emails about Donald Trump. They’re unflattering, describing Trump spending time with victims and preserving quiet.
To be blunt, it’s clear that rather more is poised to return out. Political commentators anticipate damning pictures of Trump within the combine.
In what seems to be an effort to pave the way in which politically, Kelly actually desires to speak about how Epstein wasn’t a “pedophile” however reasonably into “barely authorized” 15-year-olds. (Oh no!)
Megyn Kelly says that Jeffrey Epstein was in all probability not a pedophile, most well-liked ‘barely authorized’ 15-year-old ladies
With only a handful of Republican defectors pushing for the discharge of Epstein paperwork over the objections of Donald Trump and his loyalists, Megyn Kelly seems to be doing injury management.
Throughout the Wednesday, November 12 episode of her podcast, Kelly claimed that she is aware of “any individual very, very near this case who is able to know just about all the pieces. Not all the pieces, however just about all the pieces.”
Kelly continued: “And this particular person has informed me from the beginning years and years in the past that Jeffrey Epstein, on this particular person’s view, was not a pedophile.”
As you might have guessed, she’s drawing the road between kids who haven’t but began puberty and kids who’ve began puberty.
“He was into the hardly authorized kind. Like, he favored 15-year-old ladies,” Kelly described. There’s nothing barely authorized a couple of grown man preying upon 15-year-olds. It’s a crime! Not barely authorized, however absolutely unlawful.
Megyn Kelly: “I do know any individual very near this case…Jeffrey Epstein, on this particular person’s view, was not a pedophile…He was into the hardly authorized kind, like he favored 15 12 months previous ladies…He wasn’t into like 8 12 months olds…There is a distinction between a 15 12 months previous and a 5 12 months previous.” pic.twitter.com/a7wmT3BRJU
— Republican Accountability (@AccountableGOP) November 13, 2025
“And I notice that is disgusting,” Kelly admitted. She claimed: “I’m undoubtedly not making an attempt to make an excuse for this.”
Nonetheless, she continued, noting that Epstein”wasn’t into, like, 8-year-olds.”
(There are sometimes authorized distinctions between the sexual abuse of kids beneath sure age thresholds, however it stays against the law nonetheless)
“However he favored the very younger teen varieties that would cross for even youthful than they had been,” Kelly described, “however would look authorized to a passerby.”
Kelly famous that Pam Bondi has claimed that authorities discovered CSAM on Epstein’s units, saying “they used to name it kiddie porn, now they name it youngster sexual abuse materials” and including: “I don’t actually belief Pam Bondi’s phrase on the Epstein issues anymore.”
‘There’s a distinction between a 15-year-old and a 5-year-old’
“Yeah, so I don’t know what’s true about him,” Megyn Kelly mentioned of late intercourse trafficker Jeffrey Epstein.
“However now we have but to see anyone come ahead and say I used to be beneath 10, I used to be beneath 14 once I first got here inside his purview,” she added.
For the document, Epstein’s youngest recognized sufferer was 14 years previous. That may very well be as younger as an eighth grader.
“You’ll be able to say that’s a distinction with no distinction. I believe there’s a distinction,” Kelly insisted. “There’s a distinction between a 15-year-old and a 5-year-old, ?”
There’s a distinction, positive. However, after we are speaking about decades-older grownup males — not, say, barely older teenagers — does the excellence matter? What, one wonders, is the purpose of quibbling over phrases, right here?
In equity, on the subject of the information of what a pedophile is and isn’t, Kelly is appropriate.
A pedophile is somebody with sexual curiosity in a prepubescent youngster. A hebephile has an curiosity in additional tween-aged victims. And an ephebophile is extra taken with teenagers (a few of whom could also be authorized adults, others not).
There’s a cause that we don’t actually toss round these different two labels. As a result of, like somebody being a bit of too aware of age of consent legal guidelines from state to state and nation to nation, it doesn’t sound like a enjoyable truth.
It sounds such as you’re being overly technical and splitting hairs since you’re a creep. Generally, when drawing a distinction appears like defending an evil man, you simply have to focus much less upon being technically correct.
Comic Gianmarco Soresi has a stand-up about this. He has even repurposed it extra lately to talk about Epstein and Trump this very week.
Proper now, Trump loyalists are circling the wagons and bracing for the reality to return out
These types of distinctions come up in different contexts. For instance, folks will say “assassin” about somebody who might have dedicated manslaughter.
(On this space, being technically appropriate might allow you to keep away from a lawsuit — whereas “your honor, I’m merely a hebephile and this particular person is defaming me” is unlikely to get you far in courtroom)
The actual query right here is why Megyn Kelly is selecting to mince phrases so rigorously about Jeffrey Epstein at this specific time.
We don’t declare to know the previous Fox host, former NBC host, present podcaster’s inner-most ideas.
Nonetheless, presently, the discharge of extraordinarily damning materials connecting Donald Trump to younger teenage ladies — just like the “barely authorized” 15-year-olds to whom Kelly referred — seems imminent.
The place others within the MAGA cult are trying past Trump, others like Mike Johnson and Megyn Kelly seem determined to do injury management. If that isn’t their aim, one has to marvel simply what’s.
