Robert Redford seemed like he walked out of the ocean to grow to be a Hollywood god. He was bodily flawless. Pacific blue eyes, salt-bleached hair, a pleasant surfer-boy squint. Born in Santa Monica to a milkman and a housewife, his first reminiscence was of sliding off his mom’s lap on the Aero Theatre as a toddler and working towards the sunshine, inflicting such a ruckus that the projectionist needed to cease the movie.
He undoubtedly grew as much as seize the flicks’ consideration. He wasn’t simply telegenic however gifted, though that wasn’t a requirement for stardom when he emerged within the late ’50s when the trade was scooping up hunks like him by the bucket for tv and B-movies. All a male ingenue wanted to do was smile and kiss the lady. It might have been really easy to do this a pair occasions and wind up doing it without end. You’ll be able to perceive why so many forgotten actors made that deal, with out realizing that without end can result in a quick retirement.
But when Redford had sensed at 2 years previous that he was meant to be onscreen, by his 20s, he insisted he’d solely do it on his personal phrases. At 27, with almost zero title recognition, he horrified his then-agent by turning down a $10,000-a-week TV gig as a strait-laced psychiatrist to do a Mike Nichols theater manufacturing for simply $110. His rejection of the simple cash was an uncommon selection, notably for a cash-strapped father of two.
To understand Redford absolutely, we have now to applaud not solely the work he did however the easy, feel-good roles he rejected. He might have grow to be a star with out breaking a sweat because the struggle hero, the jock, the husband, the cowboy, the American ideally suited made incarnate. But, he had the uncommon potential to sidestep what audiences thought we needed from him to as a substitute give us one thing we didn’t know we would have liked: egocentric victors (“Downhill Racer”), self-destructive veterans (“The Nice Waldo Pepper”) and tragic males who did every little thing proper and nonetheless failed (2013’s “All Is Misplaced”).
In spirit, Redford by no means strayed removed from the teenager insurgent he’d been — a truant who’d skipped faculty, stole booze and crashed race vehicles — and the novel artist he hurled himself into turning into by quitting every little thing conventional (the soccer staff, his fraternity, faculty altogether) to maneuver to Paris the place he took up oil portray and marched towards the Soviets. He might need excelled on the sleazy roles that made Dustin Hoffman and Al Pacino well-known. On the surface, he knew they didn’t match, both.
Typically Redford mentioned no even after I want he’d have mentioned sure. Think about if he’d agreed to face off towards Elizabeth Taylor and Richard Burton in “Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf?” As a substitute, he advised Nichols he’d slightly tangle with Anne Bancroft in “The Graduate,” solely to be rejected as too good-looking for the position. “Are you able to actually think about a man such as you having issue seducing a girl?” Nichols advised him.
As a substitute, Redford used his all-American attractiveness to make us query our flattering picture of ourselves. Within the 1974 adaptation of “The Nice Gatsby,” he was the primary particular person you’d consider to play the title position as a result of he absolutely understood the purpose of the F. Scott Fitzgerald’s guide — the way it felt to signify our nation’s entire picture of success whereas realizing it’s a phony put-on. I think about him making a satan’s cut price together with his face, vowing that he received’t disguise behind goofy accents and stunt wigs the way in which different too-handsome oddballs do, if he’s allowed to make use of his attraction like a Computer virus.
If there’s one factor that unites his roles, from 1966’s “The Chase” to “Lions for Lambs,” it’s his willingness to provide the display his full charisma — to let audiences stare at him for the entire working time of a film — so long as we’ll conform to ask what’s lurking in his underbelly. Most frequently, we’ll discover annoyed idealism simply in the mean time it begins to bitter.
-
Share through
The movies of the Nineteen Sixties and ’70s that made Redford an icon principally cleave into two classes: scamps and truth-seekers. (The latter can overlap with suckers and stooges.) His antihero crooks in “Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Child” and “The Sting” captured one thing in our nationwide id, our not-so-secret perception that it’s OK to interrupt a number of guidelines to get forward — that we will forgive a sin if we just like the sinner. I like how these motion pictures offer you a responsible little tingle about rooting for Redford even when it means scratching off a few the Ten Commandments. (Thou shalt not steal until you’re Robert Redford, who received away with it throughout 2018’s “The Previous Man and the Gun.”)
Currently, the Redford roles I’ve been fascinated with are those the place his all-American attraction makes us study all of America, good and unhealthy. The 2 that immediately bounce to thoughts are his pair of political thrillers: “Three Days of the Condor,” through which he performs a CIA agent on the run from his personal co-workers, and “All of the President’s Males,” through which he doggedly uncovers the Watergate scandal. Each movies imagine within the energy of getting the reality out to the press; neither is so naive as to assume the reality alone will save the day.
However let’s not overlook “The Candidate,” a film that has Redford as underqualified political scion Invoice McKay, pressed to run for governor of California. “He’s not going to get his ass kicked — he’s cute,” his father (Melvyn Douglas) says. In the meantime, his personal marketing campaign staff cares extra concerning the size of his sideburns than concepts in his head. Launched within the 1972, 5 years into former actor Ronald Reagan’s personal governorship, the film hammers residence that superficiality may be democracy’s downfall — and the stakes are larger than who’s Hollywood‘s newest heartthrob.
Vice President Dan Quayle as soon as mentioned “The Candidate” impressed him, triggering its screenwriter Jeremy Larner to sprint this off in an op-ed: “Mr. Quayle, this was not a how-to film, it was a watch-out film. And you’re what we ought to be watching out for!”
In his later years, Redford grew to become a filmmaker himself and I can image him pulling Brad Pitt apart on the set of “A River Runs By way of It” to whisper: You don’t have to remain in that fairly–boy field. Be at liberty to get bizarre. As an actor and director, Redford continued to create characters who uncovered our our hidden rot, whether or not in our purported nationwide pastime, baseball (“The Pure”), or in our precise one, watching tv (“Quiz Present”). His flip in “Indecent Proposal” as the rich man who affords to lease his worker’s spouse lives on as shorthand for tycoons who assume they’ll purchase no matter, and whoever, they need. When he finally signed on for a superhero movie, it was, fittingly, alongside Captain America, that upright paragon of advantage — and Redford performed the villain.
What Quayle missed about “The Candidate” is that on the subject of a Robert Redford film, reality is rarely as plain as what your eyes can see. There’s all the time a deeper stage and there’s no assure that justice would win. In actual fact, I’d argue in Redford’s movies, it hardly ever does.
