[ad_1]
Tommy Lee’s spouse, Brittany Furlan, has taken authorized motion towards Falling in Reverse frontman Ronnie Radke following months of messy, headline-making allegations involving an alleged on-line relationship, catfishing claims and dueling restraining orders.
In response to court docket paperwork filed Monday, January 12, Furlan, 39, accused Radke, 42, of being “unhinged and obsessed” along with her after particulars of their alleged non-public communications turned public. Web page Six reported that Furlan claimed she and Radke started messaging on Snapchat in April 2025, allegedly exchanging express pictures and movies.
Furlan alleged that in a tough interval in her marriage to Mötley Crüe drummer Lee, 63, Radke inspired her to go away her husband. She claimed the 2 made plans to fulfill in individual in Could 2025 — plans that by no means got here to fruition when Radke allegedly didn’t present up. In her submitting, Furlan accused Radke of manipulating her and denied that she was catfished, claiming he despatched her a video proving it was actually him earlier than the story exploded on-line.
Nevertheless, months earlier, Furlan publicly advised a really completely different story. In Could 2025, she claimed she had been catfished by somebody pretending to be Radke, expressing frustration over the scrutiny the scenario induced her marriage.
“That is embarrassing for me, embarrassing for my husband,” she mentioned on the time. “This entire fing factor is embarrassing. I’ve been combating s at residence [and] I’m in a fing lodge. Like, go away us fing alone, bro. … I’m performed. Anybody can assume what they’ll. All good.”
Radke additionally denied wrongdoing, telling TMZ that “a number of different women” had been “tricked and duped” by somebody impersonating him on-line. He claimed the FBI had been concerned and later discovered himself in a heated social media alternate with Lee over the drama.
Earlier this month, Radke filed his personal non permanent restraining order towards Furlan, alleging she contacted him repeatedly on social media and even confirmed up outdoors his residence. He additionally claimed she appeared at his physician’s workplace “with out an appointment” and accused her of ongoing on-line harassment and spreading false claims. A decide denied his request, setting a court docket date for January 23.
In response, Furlan’s lawyer pushed again strongly. “Ms. Furlan is offended to search out out this petition was filed as a result of the one sufferer of harassment is her,” the assertion learn. “We’ll take all authorized measures to defend towards this frivolous lawsuit and request [that] Ms. Furlan be protected against additional harassment and threats by the petitioner.”
Furlan’s personal non permanent restraining order request was denied after a court docket clerk decided it didn’t qualify as an emergency. A decide is predicted to listen to each events’ requests on January 23, because the contentious scenario continues to unfold.
[ad_2]
