Drivers in Los Angeles County have a strong new privateness advocate after the L.A. County Board of Supervisors pushed to limit how their license plates are scanned by regulation enforcement.
The board lately voted to ask the Sheriff’s Division to extra stringently regulate its use of the license plate knowledge it collects by way of high-tech digital camera programs mounted on patrol automobiles and above roads. The measure it accredited cited reporting from CalMatters that roughly a dozen police and sheriff’s departments all through Southern California shared such knowledge with federal immigration companies.
The September movement requests that the L.A. County Sheriff’s Division, which operates independently of the supervisors, conduct yearly privateness coaching for deputies with entry to license plate cameras and that the info be barred from use for non-criminal immigration enforcement.
It additionally requests the division delete plate sightings after 60 days until they’re flagged on legal lists.
The Sheriff’s Division “welcomes” the movement and plans to overview its practices and insurance policies, the division instructed CalMatters. Per the movement, deputies are to report their license plate reader coverage modifications to the county by January. It instructed the Los Angeles Instances final month that it operates 931 automated readers.
Relying on the results of that report and whether or not Sheriff Robert Luna decides to observe the board’s path, stated Supervisor Hilda Solis, who was the lead creator of the movement, supervisors could take further motion to additional regulate license plate readers in L.A.
The Sheriff’s Division instructed CalMatters it has no “present” preparations for sharing license plate knowledge with federal companies. A California regulation enacted in 2015 prohibits the sharing of plate knowledge with out-of-state and federal entities, and requires companies that use plate readers to have a use and privateness coverage for them.
Lots of the rules within the L.A. County movement mirror these in a bit of statewide laws vetoed by the governor earlier this month. That measure, Senate Invoice 274, sought to stop misuse of license plate knowledge by limiting the lists of license plates regulation enforcement can monitor and by requiring police to element a selected case or job power use once they use knowledge from the cameras.
Solis stated she put ahead her movement partly as a result of she wished to publicly assist SB 274 earlier than Newsom selected it.
CalMatters didn’t discover that the L.A. County Sheriff’s Division shared knowledge with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement or the U.S. Border Patrol, however some Los Angeles-area companies did. The Los Angeles Police Division declined to remark when requested about such sharing.
License plate readers “stay a strong investigative device for recovering stolen autos, figuring out violent crime suspects, and discovering lacking individuals,” supervisors wrote in a September letter urging the governor to signal SB 274 into regulation. However “its public assist is dependent upon confidence that the delicate location knowledge it generates won’t ever be repurposed for impermissible civil immigration enforcement.”
Board Chairperson Kathryn Barger solid a lone “nay” vote towards SB 274. Barger disapproved of the proposed restrict on the time-frame over which regulation enforcement companies may retain plate knowledge.
Barger instructed CalMatters she believes this time restrict would have endangered the general public and made it more durable for police to resolve crimes, and that she helps Newsom’s veto. Newsom additionally opposed a 60-day knowledge retention restrict within the state invoice, citing related causes.
However that’s the identical license plate knowledge retention interval adopted by the California Freeway Patrol, and final 12 months the governor’s workplace known as a 28-day retention interval a steadiness between public security and privateness.
County supervisors have made immigration points a precedence, fast-tracking each the license plate movement and one other requesting a report on progress utilizing new state legal guidelines to guard faculties from ICE raids.
The county movement doesn’t apply to police departments since they’re ruled by native metropolis councils. The Los Angeles Metropolis Council has acquired about $400,000 in license plate reader expertise for the LAPD since June.
Two Los Angeles metropolis councilmembers, Eunisses Hernández and Hugo Soto-Martínez, persistently vote towards the LAPD’s use of license plate readers, citing considerations over their use in immigration enforcement.
“At a time when so lots of our neighbors stay in worry, sharing delicate knowledge solely will increase dangers and erodes confidence,” Hernández wrote in an announcement to CalMatters.
Legislation enforcement companies utilizing automated license plate readers all through the state proceed to interrupt the regulation.
California Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta filed a lawsuit towards the El Cajon Police Division earlier this month for violating state regulation. Reporting by KPBS earlier this month discovered that this consists of federal companies like ICE. The legal professional common’s workplace has additionally despatched letters to 18 companies statewide since 2024 for potential violations of state regulation.
Following CalMatters reporting in June, subsequent reporting by Palo Alto On-line and the San Francisco Commonplace discovered that police departments in Atherton, Menlo Park and San Francisco violated state regulation. Within the wake of that reporting, final month Jennifer Wall, a metropolis council member within the Bay Space metropolis of Woodside, known as on the San Mateo County Sheriff’s Workplace to be extra clear about how deputies conclude that searches included in quarterly reviews to the council adjust to native coverage.
When municipalities use automated license plate reader expertise, “we’d like to ensure it’s used appropriately and mechanisms [are] in place to make sure it’s used appropriately,” she instructed CalMatters. “There needs to be accountability for the way they’re used.”
Phoebe Huss and Khari Johnson write for CalMatters.
