Studying Time: 4 minutes
Greater than half a yr after Sia filed to divorce Daniel Benard, issues have taken a darkish flip.
Initially, this was a breakup. The no-fault divorce submitting appeared easy.
Now Bernad is accusing the singer of relapsing into dependancy.
Sia has informed the courtroom that her estranged husband was lately investigated for some type of “illicit” photographs of kids on his pc.
Sia is locked in an unsightly divorce from Daniel Bernad
Again in March, Sia filed to divorce husband Daniel Bernad after solely two years of marriage.
Within the courtroom paperwork, she listed the explanation for the breakup as “irreconcilable variations.”
(That’s commonplace fare for no-fault divorce)
Sia requested full custody of their little one, Summi, whom the couple welcomed in 2024.
The singer did, on the time, point out being open to visitation for Bernad.
Sia and Dan Bernad married in 2022.
They didn’t make it to their third wedding ceremony anniversary.
Earlier this autumn, the 2 have been locked right into a disagreement over funds.
Bernad has requested the decide to pay him over $250,000 per 30 days in spousal help. (He was a health care provider — an oncologist — once they met, however says that she “ceased funding” to their shared firm and thus allegedly left him with out earnings)
He additionally needs practically $80k in month-to-month child-support. Nonetheless, issues are trying rather more severe than your commonplace high-income-bracket monetary conflicts.
An alleged CSAM investigation is now a part of the custody dispute
In accordance with a report by TMZ, Sia’s divorce from Daniel Bernad has taken a nasty flip.
Bernad is asking for sole custody of their toddler, on the grounds that Sia’s previous dependancy — it’s our understanding that she has been sober for 15 years — makes her a “hazard.”
He needs to topic his estranged spouse to random, common drug testing. And he’s asking the courtroom to restrict her to two-hour visitation, 3 times per week — with knowledgeable monitor.
Nonetheless, Sia has knowledgeable the courtroom that Bernad is presently restricted to monitored visits with their little one.
The explanation, she informed the decide, is due to a toddler sex-abuse materials (CSAM) investigation.
In accordance with Sia, 1-year-old Summi has remained in her custody since their separation.
In August 2025, the couple allegedly agreed that Bernad would have very restricted visits — with knowledgeable monitor.
The explanation was an investigation by the LAPD and DCFS over what she known as “illicit little one pornography” on his pc onerous drive.
Bernad has denied any involvement relating to the investigation, even accusing Sia of getting “planted proof” to scale back his visitation.
In her submitting, Sia acknowledged that the investigation was one way or the other inconclusive and is now closed. However she informed the courtroom that she stays cautious, and would love for a caretaker like Bernad’s mom or a nanny to be current for future daddy-daughter visitations.
This can be a lot to digest
Clearly, none of us can declare to have secret insider data about Sia’s divorce from Daniel Bernad.
Did Sia relapse into dependancy? As anybody who’s sober can attest, it can occur to individuals. However that doesn’t imply that it occurred to Sia, or that it might make her a hazard to her personal little one.
We’re not sure how a CSAM investigation could possibly be inconclusive, on condition that it might hinge solely upon presumably accessible proof.
Planting CSAM on somebody’s machine is an concerned course of that would doubtless be traced to, on the very least, a particular timeframe. That’s what Bernad accused Sia of doing — which is a really severe allegation.
We are able to acknowledge that some CSAM investigations flip up nothing as a result of they’re primarily based upon false experiences. In recent times, teenagers and younger adults have bullied one another on-line by submitting false experiences, typically primarily based upon drawings (which, in contrast to CSAM, contain no victims). However that doesn’t imply that that is what occurred right here.
One has to think about that the courtroom will need to overview the LAPD and DCFS’ findings, or lack thereof, together with any related medical knowledge. The decide, like the remainder of us, won’t know what to assume till there’s extra info.
