Close Menu
DramaBreak
  • Home
  • News
  • Entertainment
  • Gossip
  • Lifestyle
  • Fashion
  • Beauty
  • Crime
  • Sports
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
DramaBreak
  • Home
  • News
  • Entertainment
  • Gossip
  • Lifestyle
  • Fashion
  • Beauty
  • Crime
  • Sports
DramaBreak
Home»Sports»That century wasn’t with what you’d name Take a look at match strokes
Sports

That century wasn’t with what you’d name Take a look at match strokes

dramabreakBy dramabreakDecember 1, 2025No Comments3 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
That century wasn’t with what you’d name Take a look at match strokes
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email




Former Indian opener Sunil Gavaskar slammed the double requirements regarding the Perth pitch for the 2025-26 Ashes opener between Australia and England. Regardless of the Take a look at match ending in below two days, the ICC rated the Perth pitch ‘Superb’.

A outstanding 19 wickets fell on Day 1 as England have been bowled out for 172 and Australia have been reeling at 123/9 at stumps. An additional 13 wickets fell on the second day, even because the hosts accomplished a run-chase of 205 by eight wickets, because of a blistering 123 by Travis Head.

Speaking concerning the unfair excessive score for the Perth wicket in his column for Sportstar, Gavaskar stated:

“Thoughts you, 13 wickets fell on day two additionally, however that century (Head’s) took away any likelihood of the pitch being rated ‘shit’ by anyone else. That century wasn’t at all times with what you’d name Take a look at match strokes and was extra like white-ball cricket pictures, however hey, who’s complaining? Not the outdated powers, for positive.”

He continued:

“Their narrative {that a} pitch with bounce and hazard to life and limb isn’t unhealthy, however {that a} pitch the place the ball turns and retains low is a shame, is unfortunately nonetheless believed even by the complexed ones within the sub-continent.”

Gavaskar’s fury stems from a number of sub-continent pitches being rated poorly as a consequence of two or three-day finishes through the years.

“He’ll nonetheless be referred to as nice” – Sunil Gavaskar on double requirements in judging batters

Sunil Gavaskar additional prolonged his accusations of double requirements by pointing to batters from the sub-continent and people from outdoors. The previous opener believes batters with poor numbers towards tempo and bounce typically get questioned, whereas these with frailties towards spin are nonetheless thought-about all-time greats.

“They are going to price a batter provided that he scores tons on pacy, bouncy pitches, but when a batter from their a part of the world doesn’t get a century within the sub-continent, he’ll nonetheless be referred to as nice. aving performed a little bit of cricket myself, I can say that batting towards tempo requires simply two actions, ahead or again. To counter spin, it isn’t nearly taking part in ahead or again, but additionally about taking place the pitch to smother the flip and assault the ball. That’s the place talent is available in,” stated Gavaskar (through the aforementioned supply).

He concluded:

“So, for me, taking part in on a turning pitch requires extra expertise and footwork than taking part in tempo. That’s the reason, when you don’t rating runs on such surfaces, you aren’t an excellent batter. Since top-quality spin is seldom, if ever, seen in these international locations and their pitches, the second they see spin within the sub-continent, they get uncomfortable and query the standard of the pitch. That’s typical, however until you rating in overseas situations, how can a batter be referred to as nice?”

Gavaskar was among the many few batters with an excellent Take a look at document at house and away situations. The champion opener averaged 50.16 in 65 house Checks and 52.11 in 60 away red-ball video games.