Close Menu
DramaBreak
  • Home
  • News
  • Entertainment
  • Gossip
  • Lifestyle
  • Fashion
  • Beauty
  • Crime
  • Sports
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
DramaBreak
  • Home
  • News
  • Entertainment
  • Gossip
  • Lifestyle
  • Fashion
  • Beauty
  • Crime
  • Sports
DramaBreak
Home»Lifestyle»Jury Convicts Trio of Revenge Murder Over Fake Gun Sale Scam
Lifestyle

Jury Convicts Trio of Revenge Murder Over Fake Gun Sale Scam

dramabreakBy dramabreakMay 8, 2026No Comments2 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Jury Convicts Trio of Revenge Murder Over Fake Gun Sale Scam
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

Three Men Guilty of Murder in Newcastle Shooting

A Supreme Court jury in Newcastle convicts three men of murdering 57-year-old Anthony Nugent over a fake gun transaction. The fatal shooting occurs at the front door of Nugent’s unit in a Hamilton South apartment complex on September 6, 2022.

Mohamad Raad, Tyrone Tuli, and Mohd Azlan Latham Aznan face murder charges after pleading not guilty. Following a six-week trial and three days of deliberations, the jury rejects their defenses and finds them guilty.

The Fake Gun Deal and Motive

Nugent sells a gel blaster—a toy that fires gel-filled projectiles—posing it as a real firearm. He receives $22,000 from a middleman who collects the item. The buyer soon discovers the deception, sparking a rapid hunt for retribution.

Crown prosecutor Carl Young explains to the jury, “Retribution and payback came quickly because when this trick or scheme was discovered that set in train a series of events.”

Evidence reveals Nugent, a known heroin dealer short on cash, borrows about $2,000 to purchase the gel blaster. Two weeks before his death, photos of the fake “pistol” circulate, leading to the deal.

Joint Criminal Enterprise and Roles

Prosecutors argue the three men form a joint criminal enterprise. Raad serves as the shooter, with Tuli and Latham Aznan present at the scene. The Crown contends the shooting results from a deliberate plan, not an accident.

The defense counters that the group only aims to recover the money. Raad’s barrister, Tony Evers, states, “When the shot was fired, Mr Raad did not intend to cause grievous bodily harm or to kill Mr Nugent.”

Young adds that Nugent “needed some money and was trying to come up with schemes about how to make some money.”

Upcoming Sentencing

The convicted men face sentencing on September 4. The verdict upholds the prosecution’s case that the killing stems directly from the botched fake gun sale.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Avatar photo
dramabreak

    Related Posts

    Australia Bolsters Social Media Age Ban with Stricter Penalties

    June 27, 2026

    Best Plane Seat Revealed to Minimize Germs on Flights

    June 27, 2026

    Full Moon in Capricorn Demands Reality Check for All Zodiac Signs

    June 27, 2026

    Portraits of Elders Share Stories of Connection and History

    June 27, 2026
    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    top

    Everest’s ‘Sleeping Beauty’: The Tragic Final Hours of Francys Arsentiev

    By dramabreakJune 27, 2026

    The story of Francys Arsentiev, known tragically as the ‘Sleeping Beauty of Everest,’ is a…

    Australia Bolsters Social Media Age Ban with Stricter Penalties

    June 27, 2026

    West Aussie Wins $1.2M Saturday Lotto Prize

    June 27, 2026
    top

    Everest’s ‘Sleeping Beauty’: The Tragic Final Hours of Francys Arsentiev

    By dramabreakJune 27, 2026

    The story of Francys Arsentiev, known tragically as the ‘Sleeping Beauty of Everest,’ is a…

    Lifestyle

    Australia Bolsters Social Media Age Ban with Stricter Penalties

    By dramabreakJune 27, 2026

    Government Proposes Enhanced Protections for Young Social Media Users New legislation is being introduced to…

    DramaBreak
    • About Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms Of Service
    © 2026 DramaBreak. All rights reserved by DramaBreak.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.